Archive for May, 2010

Free Music!

Friday, May 28th, 2010

So, not to go all press-releasey on you, but there’s this cool new thing on the Minnesota Orchestra website today. It’s a free MP3 download of Stravinsky’s Petrouchka, which we performed and recorded just last night. Yes, you have to register with us to get the download, and from the look of things, I’m guessing that registration might result in your hearing from our marketing department in the future, but hey – free music! And apparently, we’ll be doing this again next week with our performance of Bruckner’s 7th Symphony, giving away what normally isn’t available for any price – a live concert recording you can keep forever. Next season, we’ll put up a bunch more concert recordings, but I’m told you’ll have to start paying (albeit a very small amount) for those.

This is, of course, exactly the sort of thing that everyone in the music world but American symphony orchestras has been doing for quite a while now. We should have done it years ago, but the media rules governing our industry are massively complex, nationally negotiated, and quite frankly, about two decades out of date. There are some very good, smart people who have been working to change this, but the process frequently seems to get hung up when other people with very old, dull axes to grind start grinding them against the wheels of progress. If that makes any sense.

But anyway, the good news is that we are, finally, making progress, and these downloads are some of the first evidence of it. Over in St. Paul, the chamber orchestra launched its own music-streaming site this week as well, and really, once you open those floodgates, it’s nearly impossible to close them again, so with any luck, these projects will be the first of a lot of great things to come!

Inhuman expectations

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

The classical blogosphere has been abuzz with reactions to the recent cross-country tour of the LA Philharmonic with their new music director, Gustavo Dudamel. The “Dude”, as he’s been monikered (cue “Big Lebowski” reference…oh wait, the LA Times has already done that – see the last line), has been touted by many (and certainly by the LA Phil PR machine) as the future of classical music (no pressure…).

It is, I think, human nature to want to cut the mighty down to size, and perhaps that lies behind some of the criticism – Peter Dobrin of the Philadelphia Inquirer puts it succinctly as “Dudamel falls short of hype”. The main critique, from San Francisco to New York, is the perceived incompleteness of musical ideas and unevenness of pacing and interpretation. John von Rhein of the Chicago Tribune goes so far as to call it a “lack of musical depth”.

All of which I think is a little unfair. Dudamel, at 29, is a young conductor and remarkably young to be a music director of a major ensemble. Those of us who have seen him in action (albeit via video) immediately realize his volcanic musical energy, communicative passion and tremendous charisma. If one’s interpretive ideas are formalized and codified at 29, one should quit conducting; that’s the whole point of being an artist (absorbing, reimagining, constantly developing) and the whole joy of following an artist over the course of their career (being privy to that often extraordinary journey).

But in the end, it’s Anne Midgette at the Washington Post who hits the nail on the head for me. Her point, in a nutshell – Dudamel doesn’t represent the future of classical music:

The people who are trying to move classical music into the future are thinking about alternate kinds of programming, new venues, different repertory…Dudamel’s whole training appears to have been about perpetuating the status quo…I think…one reason he’s been so exciting to many people in the [classical music] field: he represents a future without radical change

Because, if you think about it, there’s nothing terribly forward-thinking or future-minded about a telegenic and charismatic young conductor (hello, Leonard Bernstein?). Yes, the back story (Venezuela, El Sistema) makes for a compelling rags-to-riches narrative, but that can’t carry the future of classical music either (although the notion of El Sistema itself is being implemented in several U.S. cities – now that might really impact the future).

To all the critics and haters out there – I hope you’ll judge Dudamel as you would any other enormously talented 29-year-old conductor. And to those who think the future of classical music lies in a magnetic young maestro – we can’t rest something as important and burdensome on a single set of shoulders. We need ideas, outside-the-box thinking and the courage to break from the past, and from what is familiar – strenuous and scary work. It’s much easier, I suppose, to do what we’re doing now; pinning our hopes on a savior who, eventually, may become the scapegoat at whom we point an accusatory finger.

Operatwitter results

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Although I blogged about Omniscient Mussel’s Operatwitter contest (condense an opera plot into a Tweet – 140 characters), I’ve neglected to link the results, so, quite belatedly, here are the 2010 winners

My personal fave is a side-pot winner:

OMG, so, it’s like a remake of ‘Rent’, only they used, like, CLASSICAL music. What a cool idea, right? Cue facepalm. [La Boheme]

Reawakening

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Last night, I was playing a chamber music concert at Minneapolis’s MacPhail Center for Music with three of my favorite fellow MN Orch musicians. It went well, I thought (my evidence for this conclusion is that a six-year-old boy in the front row was rocking out on air guitar to the hard-driving second movement of our Hindemith quartet,) and afterwards, we gathered in the usual spot below the auditorium to talk to any audience members who wanted to come up and say hello. Many did, mostly familiar faces from our audiences at Orchestra Hall, and no small number of professional musicians as well.

And then, towards the end of our makeshift receiving line, heading straight for me with arms outstretched, was a woman I hadn’t thought I was ever likely to see again. Pam Shaffer retired from the Minnesota Orchestra several seasons ago after a whopping forty years in our first violin section. That kind of longevity can often lead musicians to start thinking of themselves like factory workers, cogs in a machine they no longer care about. But not Pam. She always seemed to have a smile on her face, and a kind word to say to everyone. She was a legend in the orchestra’s education department, having practically invented our Adopt-a-School program. And most importantly, her love of performing never seemed to dull.

And even after all that time logged with one orchestra, she didn’t leave of her own accord. Like so many musicians, her body literally rebelled against all the years of practice and performance; her thumbs ceased to work properly, and began causing her excruciating pain whenever she played. After trying every treatment she could think of without success, she reluctantly retired and moved to New Mexico with her husband. I assumed I’d probably seen her for the last time.

But there she was last night at MacPhail, beaming at me with that familiar smile and giving me a big hug as she congratulated our quartet on the performance. I asked how she’d been, and how life in New Mexico was. Her husband had passed a few years ago, she said, but life was starting to be good again. After finally accepting that her life in music was over and leaving it behind, she’d found that it just wouldn’t leave her alone, busted thumbs or no. After a few years in the desert, she’d succumbed to her old love, and hauled her violin out of its case, physical pain be damned.

And then, she said, she realized anew just how much that simple ability to create music out of thin air had meant to her all those years in Minnesota. “And so,” she smiled, holding her hands up in front of my face, “I got both thumbs completely reconstructed! And now I can play all I want. It’s not quite the same as being back in the orchestra, but it’s wonderful!”

We’ve all got goals in life as musicians. Some of us want to see how far up the “major orchestra” ladder we can climb. Others want a principal chair in whatever orchestra will give them one. Some want to be surrounded by great friends and fun personalities, and could care less about prestige. And some even just want a place to draw a steady paycheck while they pursue side projects that have endless artistic merit but little in the way of a revenue stream.

Me, I’ve got pretty much one goal at this point. I want never to forget how much this career meant to me when I first stumbled into it. I want never to lose my enjoyment of watching some kid’s eyes light up when she hears you play something really incredible. And I want, when I reach my own retirement age, to still have enough perspective in my head and joy in my heart to remember, like Pam, why I started down this path in the first place.

Innocent Query Of A Baseball Fan

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

Dear Minnesota Twins,

Surely you know that I love you deeply, eternally, and unconditionally. And it is because of that love, and my conviction that open and honest communication only strengthens our relationship, that I must ask you, in all seriousness, the following question:

Why do you persist in inviting dozens upon dozens of elementary school “choirs” to sing the National Anthem at your games, despite overwhelming evidence that…

a) …they cannot sing that song,

b) …they probably can’t sing much of anything else, either,

c) …they aren’t actually “choirs” in the sense of being divided into parts and expected to harmonize (or sing in tune) with each other,

d) …absolutely no one thinks it’s cute unless his/her actual kid is in the group, and

e) …there is no shortage of people (including children!) available who can actually sing/play The Star-Spangled Banner quite nicely?

I’m only asking. Out of love. xoxo

Sam

Friday humor (?)

Friday, May 21st, 2010

Is this supposed to be funny, or is it only inadvertently so? I’m just disappointed that this is a rare instance of representing a female conductor in popular culture, and it’s for this kind of product…well, just watch, and tell me if I’m being overly sensitive!

No, We’re Not Dead

Friday, May 21st, 2010

As I mentioned a few weeks back, things were bound to be a little on the dead side this month here on the blog, due to various commitments, projects, and heavy practice schedules that Sarah and I are experiencing just at the moment. It’s probably obvious at this point that this week is when everything came to a head, and I just haven’t had a spare moment to even think about blogging.

The primary thing consuming my time at the moment is the seemingly endless preparation process for the viola auditions the Minnesota Orchestra is holding this weekend, stretching into next Monday. (We have a leadership, or “titled” position open, so several of us in the section are participating.) And even though it’s only 8am right now, I’m already behind on my practicing for today, so I don’t really have time to give you a long blow-by-blow account of how we get ready for these things. (Also, I’m already pretty sure I’ve jinxed the whole enterprise just by telling you I’m taking part in it, but whatever. Jinxes are for wimps.)

Fortunately, I actually wrote a long blog post about the terror of the orchestral audition a couple of years back – it’s over here, and involves a violin audition that resulted in the hire of the outstanding Rebecca Corruccini. (I think, anyway. We had a couple of violin auditions that spring, and my memory is hazy…)

(By the way, if you want to get a sense of just how angry and bitter the music world can make some people, check out the comments on that old post…)

Haydn’s Head Fake

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

Franz Joseph Haydn, in addition to being one of the more underrated great composers these days, was famous for the sense of humor he deployed in his symphonies. There’s the ubiquitous “Surprise” Symphony, of course, and the “Farewell” Symphony, in which the players leave the stage one by one as the music is going on (supposedly Haydn’s not so subtle way of requesting that his orchestra be granted vacation time.) Despite his status as one of the most prominent composers of his day, Haydn never took himself or his music too seriously.

I bring this up because we just got done with a week of concerts that concluded with my favorite Haydn gag – the finale of his Symphony No. 90. (Yes, 90 – the man wrote a metric ton of music, usually on insane deadlines.) Essentially, Haydn wrote a false ending into the symphony – a climactic flourish followed immediately by four empty bars in which no one plays anything, after which the strings sneak back in and keep going. It’s a clear attempt to trick the audience into applauding before the piece is over, and it pretty much never fails. You can’t avoid the joke even if you wanted to, since Haydn wrote in the exact number of beats he wanted to be silent after the head fake.

I’ve played the piece a few times, under conductors with varying levels of interest in the joke.  (MN Orch violist Ken Freed once conducted it at the summer camp we both work at, and when the audience started applauding, he actually brought the orchestra up for a bow before continuing.) But I’d never seen anyone commit quite as fully to the impishness of the moment as Mark Wigglesworth did with us this week…

Did you notice how he actually started subtlely slowing down the tempo about 12 bars before the fakeout? Genius. And that huge yank we’re all doing with our bows was custom-ordered by Mark, too. Which might seem odd and unnecessary, since there’s no way the audience isn’t going to applaud. But there’s a reason for the extra dose of theatrics – technically, this second half of the finale has a repeat. No one ever takes it, since the joke’s already been made, and no one’s going to fall for it twice, right? Right?

Yup, we took the repeat. And Mark gave explicit orders that we were to sell the second head fake with everything we had, so as to create that wonderfully awkward moment you see above. Clearly, no one in the hall was actually fooled a second time, but if we were just going to hang there with our arms in the air, they almost had to go along with it. And besides, maybe that really is the end the second time around? …maybe?

Nope. And what I really love about this is that Haydn knew perfectly well that people weren’t going to be satisfied with just laughing for a moment at his joke – they’d definitely want to whisper with their neighbors about it for a few seconds. So for roughly 30 bars after the fake ending, nothing of consequence happens in the music. We’re essentially in a holding pattern while everyone gets it out of their system, and then we ramp up for the real ending, which you notice Mark was kind enough to signal to the crowd.

And the funniest (and most apropos) part about it, for me, was that this came at the end of a concert that had started with Wagner and Brahms, two of the least lighthearted composers in history, and fierce rivals besides. Nothing like giving your audience an hour of weighty, cerebral meat and potatoes, and then inviting Haydn to come and thumb his nose at everyone for dessert…

(Many thanks to MN Orch librarian Valerie Little for the camerawork…)

Repetitive Stress

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

I’ve been playing a lot of viola lately. And even as I write it, I realize how ridiculous that sounds, since I’ve pretty much always been playing a lot of viola lately. But the last few months have been even heavier than usual, thanks to chamber music commitments, Kinder Konzerts, a truly challenging batch of music in this last quarter of the orchestra’s regular season, and assorted other assignments that have added up to me having my instrument in my hand for something like 8-10 hours a day most days, as opposed to the 4-5 that I consider my norm.

Again, that might not seem like all that many hours, since many of you probably work shifts at least that long at your jobs, and are even now wondering how you can score a job that averages 4-5 hours a day of work. (Hint: Start by giving up most of your childhood to practice scales, beginning around age 4…) But one of the realities of what we do for a living is that it’s an essentially physical activity, and an extremely repetitive one at that, and since the human body experiences as much stress from small muscle movements as it does from large ones, doubling your daily workload can put you at serious risk for injury.

This is not to say I’ve gone and injured myself – I’m pretty careful about being aware of tension, stress, and muscle fatigue, and I had great teachers who made a point of teaching me how to lessen my chances of ever having to suffer the humiliation of explaining to a doctor that I’ve been seriously injured by a viola. But I’ll admit that I’ve been feeling more than the usual amount of twinges, tweaks, and general soreness in my back, shoulders, and arms over the last few weeks.

My viola’s been feeling the impact of the added workload as well, which might surprise non-musicians who think of our instruments as inanimate objects that we, the great artistes, bring to life. In reality, our instruments are as highly personal to us as a relative or a friend; they each have distinct personalities (and flaws) of their own, and we have to become highly sensitized to when they might be trying to send us a signal that they’re in pain.

For instance, I have a big string quartet performance (tickets still available!) coming up in a little over a week, so a while back, I made a mental note to be sure to change my strings late this week, and possibly look into getting my bow rehaired and my soundpost adjusted as well – routine maintenance, just to insure that my oh-so-finicky instrument sounds its best on an important day. The string changing got pushed up a few days when I actually snapped one of them while practicing on Tuesday – I changed all four at once, just to keep it simple – and that’s where the trouble started.

I use a brand of strings that are pretty famous for having a quick “break-in” period. (Whenever you first put on a new set, they’ll sound metallic and raw until they’re played on a bit, and “a bit” can vary from half an hour to a week, depending on the construction.) But after two full days of heavy use, my new set still sounded awful, and I started to have a bit of trouble controlling my sound in passages that were particularly loud or soft. And then on Thursday afternoon, I finished up a concert and a quartet rehearsal, headed home to practice, and discovered that my viola had somehow, in the three-mile trip between Orchestra Hall and my house, become possessed by demons.

I’m serious, you guys. Demonic possession. It was the only possible explanation. I couldn’t get a single note out without a squawk, and pieces that I’d ripped through with no trouble the day before suddenly became Bataan Death March-like slogs, during which I’d have to stop every three or four bars to pick up and reassemble the various detritus I’d left lying around on the previous phrase. My viola sounded like some $150 outfit from your junior high orchestra, and I started to panic a little, partly because it all seemed so sudden, but mostly because I’m a neurotic freak who tends to assume that everything that goes wrong with my playing is, in fact, an ominous sign that I’m finally about to be exposed as a complete fraud who should never have been given a job in a professional orchestra in the first place.

Any professional string player reading that description already knows what was actually wrong, of course: open seams. (English translation: when some of the glue holding the top and back of your instrument to the “ribs” of the soundbox fails, those seams can open ever so slightly, which throws off the whole vibration of the box and leads to minor demons and occasional poltergeists sneaking in through the previously sealed gaps.) When I made an emergency stop at my local luthier the next day, it took Frank about five minutes to find the two open corners and one seam that had reduced me to a quivering mess. And because I had a lesson to teach and a concert to play later that evening, it took him only 3-1/2 hours to glue ‘em all back up, clamp ‘em down, and get the now-exorcised thing back to me in perfect working order.

So all’s well that ends well, right? Not quite yet, actually – all those small muscle groups that are so susceptible to damage have been working overtime for the last few days compensating for the viola demons, which means that my personal setup is a little out of whack now that I actually have a demon-free instrument again. So today’s assignment is to put everything back where it was a week ago, before any of this foolishness started.

It can feel awfully cyclical, this sort of practicing; you’re always either trying desperately to perfect a new skill set, or going back and trying to fix whatever old skill the new skill put a kink in. But hey, that kind of mind-numbing, repetitive practice is what Saturday afternoon baseball was invented to supplement. There’s nothing like watching the Twins battle their Yankee Stadium demons while celebrating the defeat of mine…

How not to address an orchestra

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Those of you who frequent this blog know that I often comment on the differing perspectives of players and conductors, both from a musical and and organizational point of view. Add into the mix my posts about the non-musical, managerial duties that a conductor shoulders, and you probably get a good idea of my usual take on intra-organizational struggles; it’s never a black and white situation, and there’s rarely a single bad guy.

I’m going to break from my own mold.

The Richardson Symphony Orchestra is a regional ($800K budget) ensemble in Texas led by Anshel Brusilow, perhaps best known as conductor of the Dallas Symphony in the 70’s (he was also concertmaster of the Philadelphia Orchestra for 7 years under Ormandy). According to a press release from Dallas-Fort Worth Professional Musicians Association (affiliated Local 72-147), the RSO has been late on payments to its musicians:

Musicians performing with the Richardson Symphony Orchestra have had to wait weeks and months to receive their paychecks for most every concert performed over the past two years. Orchestra members still have not been paid for their April 10 concert performance, despite repeated promises from management to make the payments. “We’ve given the company plenty of time to get its financial act together and our pocketbooks have suffered for it,” said principal trumpet player and orchestra committee member Bert Truax. “We want the public and patrons to know what has been going on,” he said.

A legitimate enough complaint, right?

Music Director Anshel Brusilow’s response: listen to full audio here.

Some quotable quotes:

People are starving to death and you’ve got a job, and you’re a little late being paid so you’re upset…well, wake up, get a life!

(After claiming that he himself wasn’t paid in a timely manner, and is currently still out 70% of his salary from fiscal 09′):

The difference between me and you is that I still love music.

Brusilow rails against Bert Truax, the principal trumpet of the RSO, who lent his name to the original press release. It’s insinuated that Truax begged Brusilow for the job in a less that professional way. Truax’s response: “I quit”. To which Brusilow responds:

Is there anybody else who doesn’t want to play for me? Get out if you don’t want to play!

(“You got it”, says another player).

And then…the rehearsal continues. Surreal.

I’m surprised that the entire orchestra didn’t get up and leave. I understand that Brusilow is in his 80’s and came of age in a very different era – when conductors could hire and fire on whim, and did so. But those days are long gone, and this behavior is no longer considered normal or even appropriate.

This kind of abuse from the podium is unacceptable. The podium is not a bully pulpit. And to make one’s personal grievances and attacks in the relatively public forum of an orchestra rehearsal in the era of Flip cameras and the Internet is a dangerous proposition.

As for the actual conflict at the RSO (delayed payroll), it’s a regrettable situation of which I have very little information, and thus have no basis to comment. As for the response of Brusilow, I will say with conviction; this is a disgraceful way to address an orchestra.

UPDATE: A blog reader pointed out to me that on Brusilow’s website under the “availability” tab, he offers not only lectures, masterclasses and guest conducting but also “Orchestral Relations Counseling”.

Oh the irony…